Killing Floor by Lee Child Review 3/5

killing floor by lee child

Overall Impression: Chilling, compelling and clever, but also with a number of flaws I found difficult to overlook.

A friend of mine recommended this book to me for the thriller category of the Eclectic Reader Challenge I’m taking part in, and consequently very kindly lent me the book. This will be the second book I have read for this challenge. If you want to find out more or participate in the challenge yourself you can check out the original creator at Book’d Out or you can visit my post here. 🙂
I will admit straight away that I am not the biggest fan of thriller/crime type books. Not only because of the annoying stereotypes found in them but also because they rarely manage to capture my attention from start to finish. I often find my mind drifting when I reach the middle point. However, the whole point of the Eclectic Reader Challenge is to read outside of your comfort zone, “and who knows” I thought, “maybe I’ll even enjoy it!”

Killing Floor is the first book in the phenomenal bestselling Jack Reacher series by Lee Child. It introduces Reacher for the first time, as the tough ex-military cop of no fixed abode. Trained to think fast and act faster, he is the perfect action hero for men and women alike.
Margrave is a no-account little town in Georgia. Jack Reacher jumps off a bus and walks fourteen miles in the rain to reach it, an arbitrary detour in search of a dead guitar player.
But Margrave has just had its first homicide in thirty years. And Reacher is the only stranger in town. So he is thrown into jail. As the body count mounts, only one thing is for sure: they picked the wrong guy to take the fall.

I won’t expand on the blurb of this book any further, due to it’s genre of thriller/crime it is best to let the book unravel at it’s own pace when you read it.

I must admit, I found it very difficult to get into this book at first, and the main reason for that was the writing style. Lee Child’s technique is to consistently use short sentences, and the dude totally has commaritus! (excessive use of comma’s in Becky language.) I just found this so difficult to get on with. I was trying to get a grip of the story, the setting, and the personality of the main character and I felt like it ruined the flow. It kept stopping and starting. Take the first few lines for example:

“ I was arrested in Eno’s diner. At twelve o’clock. I was eating eggs and drinking coffee. A late breakfast, not lunch. I was wet and tired after a long walk in heavy rain. All the way from the highway to the edge of town. The diner was small, but bright and clean. Brand new, built to resemble a converted railroad car.

The entire book continues with this style. I understand that use of short sentences often helps to build tension or to speed up the pace of a scene but I just felt his use of it was excessive. However my opinion is down to personal taste, and I’m sure others may enjoy this style, especially since the author has been praised by Stephen King. In spite of this major flaw, there were still aspects of his writing I enjoyed. I found it witty, realistic and very well paced in terms of revealing plot.

I was impressed with the storyline of Killing Floor. Unlike many other thriller/crime books it managed to capture my attention for the majority of the story. It did start to slow down a bit towards the end, but luckily picked up again for the grand finale. I also love the way Lee lets his plot skillfully unravel . Each time the characters got excited by figuring out one of the pieces in the complex puzzle of murders, I was swept up in the excitement with them, turning each page faster than the one before.
I also appreciated the fact that Lee Child had thoroughly researched his topic. There was nothing vague about this book, he knew everything varying from bullet trajectories to the number of $ found in America.
However there was to me, one large hole in the plot. I’m sure that many others could argue Lee’s case but I found it slightly unrealistic that the leading characters were sneaking around right underneath the enemy’s nose, in a place that there would surely have been CCTV cameras. It just didn’t make sense to me.

It was the characters however, that I was the most disappointed with. Knowing that Lee Child was both a famous and popular author, I was hoping he might have put a much more original spin on his characters. But unfortunately this wasn’t the case, and I’m afraid this is when I start to lose interest in the crime/thriller genre. The lead was ridiculously stereotypically masculine. I know I usually go on quite a lot about female representation in books, but male representation is just as important. An ex military soldier, with a stiff upper lip and all the right answers wasn’t a terribly complex character to me. (Although maybe Lee will develop his personality further in the subsequent books) There was also no doubt at any point in the book that he would get out of the situation alive. In many books you know that the main character cannot possibly be killed off e.g. Harry in Harry Potter, yet at many points in the book you still fear for their life. But this just didn’t happen with the lead character Jack Reacher.
The biggest issue I had with this book though, was the character of Roscoe, Jack Reacher’s love interest. We’re constantly told throughout the book how strong, and competent she is, and the author tries to push this idea throughout the book. However her actions speak otherwise. Her only purpose in the book is for sex and to be a victim. And even though she is a detective, all of the puzzle pieces are worked out by Reacher and another male detective Finlay, and the only answer Roscoe does come up with, turns out to be wrong. I don’t think I would have minded as much if she had just been there as a character, but the fact that we are supposed to see her as a strong female when she clearly isn’t was kind of irritating.

Overall I enjoyed this book much more than I was expecting to, and I think others will enjoy it too as long as this is their style of book. (As it clearly isn’t mine haha.)  But that being said, I’m certainly interested enough to continue giving the series a go to see where it is heading (especially since my friend has leant me the second book so I don’t have to pay for it mwuhuhhuu.)

I would ideally recommend this book to males in their 30s and 40s as I would generally gauge this as it’s intended demographic. However, that does not mean others won’t enjoy this book, especially those that are fans of the thriller genre. Due to a couple of chilling torture scenes as well as some potentially confusing economic aspects of the book I would suggest it for 16 year olds and upwards that are fans of the thriller genre and like the stereotypical ‘hero’ character that appears to be unstoppable and always gets the girl.

(To read my review of the next book in the Jack Reacher series, Die Trying, click here.)

Writing Style: 2/5
Originality: 2/5
Entertainment: 3/5
Character Development: 3/5
Would I recommend this book? Yes

Overall 3/5

 

Image Sources:
Killing Floor book cover: http://nickswan.net/

Advertisements

15 thoughts on “Killing Floor by Lee Child Review 3/5

    • Yeah, his books do seem to be everywhere I look, that and James Patterson’s. I’m thinking it’s a little overkill. I
      There’s around eight books in this Jack Reacher series I think, I doubt I’ll like them enough to get through them all, but hey, I never turn down free books!

      Also, I’ve started reading your book. It’s good so far 🙂

  1. A shame you didn’t enjoy it more, it is an enjoyable series if you don’t take it to seriously. A stand alone thriller might have suited you better for this challenge. Thanks for sharing your review

    Shelleyrae @ Book’d out

    • Yeah so am I, I’m still interested enough to continue reading though! Quite possibly it would have been better to pick a stand alone book, but since my friend was offering it to me I decided to give it a go anyway. 🙂
      Thanks for stopping by to comment!

  2. I adore mystery stories very deeply, but I’ve never been able to get into thrillers- I feel like they translate better to films than they do books. The only one I read that I really enjoyed was “Day of the Jackal” by Frederick Forsythe, and even then I sold it to a used bookstore, mercenary being that I am. And character depth, or lack thereof, is a problem- I don’t care if it’s an airplane paperback thriller, it should still be possible to make compelling characters. And as for fearing for the main character’s life even if you know they can’t die- show that their actions have consequences, and it’ll give a whole new level of tension because they can’t just run around and do whatever they first think of to stop the bad guys…

    • I completely agree with you there. I just don’t know why there seems to be a lack of complex characters in thriller fiction. They always tend to go for the traditional stiff upper lip guy – then incorperate some sort of revenge motive e.g. a murdered wife or something, and then think this is enough for us to sympathise with the character, and make them complex because of their internal stuggle.
      I’ve never heard of Day of the Jackal, now I’m curious! Although I have to admit, I don’t think I will be picking it up to read anytime soon.
      I also agree thrillers work better as TV/film, I’m glad I’m not the only one out there a bit saddened by the unorigionality of thriller novels! 🙂

  3. The dialogue reminds me of those black and white detective-type movies where the main character narrates whats going on in that suave, sloooow, dramatic voice (there must be a name for this type of movie but have no idea what it is).
    I actually don’t mind short sentences but I can see how it might be annoying stretched out over 300+ pages.

    • Do you mean film noir? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_noir Hehe, check me out with the media knowledge! I knew also those lessons would pay off one day! 😛

      It was certainly an induvidual technique, I’ve read a lot of books that use it as a strong element in their writing, but I’d never come across one before that used it all the time. I think it was quite good in terms of getting information across to the reader quickly, but I just found it really exhausting. Which is strange, you’d think it would be the other way around!

      • Wahey!!! Awesome, I learnt something, film noir. I knew there must be a name for it. I’m aways seeing parodies of it, movies like Sin City for example.
        Repetitions of any nature will become exhausting. I think that rule of good writing :’a balance of short and long sentences’ makes perfect sense.

  4. Interesting review. I’ve never read anything but Lee Childs, but I don’t mind that genre.

    One series in particular you might like a bit more is The Seven Ancient Wonders series by Matthe w Reilly (Australian!). It’s got the main macho character, but he seems to have a lot of depth, but you honestly fear for his life A LOT. The love interest as well is just as competent and strong as him, and aside from that the storyline is just awesome. Basically its a thriller that brings into ancient artefacts, history and more. Think Dan Brown crossed with James Bond a little.

    • Thanks 🙂 I’m glad I gave this one a go, it has the potential to grow into a great series, it just depends what direction he decides to take them in next.

      That sounds great! I love anything to do with ancient artifacts and history. I might just have to check those out. I’m always greatful for a great book recommendation (speaking of which I just bought The Night Circus because of your review of it 😛 )
      I really enjoyed the film for the Davinci Code so I’ve invested in several of Dan Brown’s books but I haven’t read them yet.
      Have you read any Dan Brown?

      • Oohh! Double awesome. I think youll love the seven ancient wonders then, thats what I really love about them (that and the hero sounds fucking awesome ahahaa)

        Let me know what you think about the night circus!! (I should get commission or something…)

        Yeah, ive read all his books, the davinci code a few times. You’ll enjoy it, i always do. Basically you feel like a smarty pants because you know half the things he references ahaha

      • Haha. You certainly should. I must admit, I’m really itching to read it but I’ve got to keep up with my Eclectic Reader Challege atm and I’m slightly behind. But never fear! I shall get to it. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s